<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U2&#8217;s Bono Sings the Battle Cry for Online News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ryanthornburg.org/2009/06/25/u2s-bono-sings-the-battle-cry-for-online-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Journalism innovation, leadership, research and editorial product development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:55:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Stepno</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanthornburg.org/2009/06/25/u2s-bono-sings-the-battle-cry-for-online-news/comment-page-1/#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Stepno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanthornburg.org/blog/?p=365#comment-1407</guid>
		<description>Excellent context and juxtaposition, Ryan. One other thing the Web can provide, of course, is historical depth to answer more of those &quot;why&quot; and &quot;how&quot; questions. Is that something news sites should leave to whichever readers are curious enough to leap to their search engines? Sometimes yes, sometimes no?  

Here are a few links:

CNN Gulf War I: http://tinyurl.com/ldezhj
U2&#039;s ZooTV in action: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5omeaIIcbc
U2 ZooTV Transcript: 
http://homepage.mac.com/darekpro1/u2/Dublin_transcript.html

I wonder how long those links will last. Ironically, CNN&#039;s links to its own .mov files of the 1991 videos are now &quot;404.&quot; I&#039;ll ask a friend there for new links.

Come to think of it, U2&#039;s fans DID &quot;come all the way out here to watch TV&quot; -- but to watch it in a new way, as those huge walls of video, as part of an immediate &quot;now&quot; experience including irony, artistry, politics, idealism and rock &#039;n&#039; roll... which also supports your comments on choosing among multimedia/interactive Web tools, facing the &quot;experience economy,&quot; and all. 

interactively yrs,

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent context and juxtaposition, Ryan. One other thing the Web can provide, of course, is historical depth to answer more of those &#8220;why&#8221; and &#8220;how&#8221; questions. Is that something news sites should leave to whichever readers are curious enough to leap to their search engines? Sometimes yes, sometimes no?  </p>
<p>Here are a few links:</p>
<p>CNN Gulf War I: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ldezhj" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ldezhj</a><br />
U2&#8217;s ZooTV in action: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5omeaIIcbc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5omeaIIcbc</a><br />
U2 ZooTV Transcript:<br />
<a href="http://homepage.mac.com/darekpro1/u2/Dublin_transcript.html" rel="nofollow">http://homepage.mac.com/darekpro1/u2/Dublin_transcript.html</a></p>
<p>I wonder how long those links will last. Ironically, CNN&#8217;s links to its own .mov files of the 1991 videos are now &#8220;404.&#8221; I&#8217;ll ask a friend there for new links.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, U2&#8217;s fans DID &#8220;come all the way out here to watch TV&#8221; &#8212; but to watch it in a new way, as those huge walls of video, as part of an immediate &#8220;now&#8221; experience including irony, artistry, politics, idealism and rock &#8216;n&#8217; roll&#8230; which also supports your comments on choosing among multimedia/interactive Web tools, facing the &#8220;experience economy,&#8221; and all. </p>
<p>interactively yrs,</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
